Common Errors in Statistics (and How to Avoid Them) (4th by Phillip I. Good, James W. Hardin

By Phillip I. Good, James W. Hardin

Uploader's Note: Ripped from Wiley Books Online.

Amazon hyperlink: http://www.amazon.com/Common-Errors-Statistics-Avoid-Them/dp/1118294394

Praise for universal error in information (and the best way to steer clear of Them)

"A very enticing and useful e-book for all who use records in any setting."
—CHOICE

"Addresses well known blunders usually made in information assortment and offers an integral advisor to actual statistical research and reporting. The authors' emphasis on cautious perform, mixed with a spotlight at the improvement of ideas, unearths the genuine worth of records whilst utilized effectively in any region of research."
—MAA Reviews

Common error in records (and the right way to stay away from Them), Fourth variation offers a mathematically rigorous, but quite simply available origin in records for knowledgeable readers in addition to scholars studying to layout and whole experiments, surveys, and medical trials.

Providing a constant point of coherency all through, the hugely readable Fourth variation makes a speciality of debunking well known myths, studying universal error, and teaching readers on how one can decide on the fitting statistical strategy to deal with their particular activity. The authors start with an creation to the most resources of errors and supply thoughts for keeping off them. next chapters define key tools and practices for exact research, reporting, and version construction. The Fourth version good points newly further themes, including:

* Baseline data
* Detecting fraud
* Linear regression as opposed to linear behavior
* Case keep watch over studies
* minimal reporting requirements
* Non-random samples
* The booklet concludes with a thesaurus that outlines keyword phrases, and an in depth bibliography with a number of hundred citations directing readers to assets for extra study.

Presented in an easy-to-follow variety, universal blunders in records, Fourth version is a wonderful booklet for college students and pros in undefined, govt, drugs, and the social sciences.

Show description

Read Online or Download Common Errors in Statistics (and How to Avoid Them) (4th Edition) PDF

Similar statistics books

Damned Lies and Statistics: Untangling Numbers from the Media, Politicians, and Activists (Updated Edition)

Right here, through well known call for, is the up-to-date variation to Joel Best's vintage advisor to figuring out how numbers can confuse us. In his new afterword, most sensible makes use of examples from contemporary coverage debates to mirror at the demanding situations to bettering statistical literacy. considering that its e-book ten years in the past, Damned Lies and facts has emerged because the go-to guide for recognizing undesirable statistics and studying to imagine severely approximately those influential numbers.

Computational and Mathematical Modeling in the Social Sciences

Mathematical types within the social sciences became more and more subtle and frequent within the final decade. this era has additionally noticeable many reviews, so much lamenting the sacrifices incurred in pursuit of mathematical perfection. If, as critics argue, our skill to appreciate the realm has no longer more suitable in the course of the mathematization of the social sciences, we would are looking to undertake a distinct paradigm.

Computational Statistics: Volume 1: Proceedings of the 10th Symposium on Computational Statistics

The position of the pc in information David Cox Nuffield university, Oxford OXIINF, U. ok. A class of statistical difficulties through their computational calls for hinges on 4 parts (I) the volume and complexity of the knowledge, (il) the specificity of the targets of the research, (iii) the wide facets of the method of research, (ill) the conceptual, mathematical and numerical analytic complexity of the equipment.

Performance metrics : the levers for process management

Which functionality measures in the event you use? the most obvious resolution is that it depends upon what you need to in attaining, which another person should not outline for you. finally, it's your association, your division, or your approach. yet when you are transparent approximately what you need to accomplish, how do you type via numerous attainable metrics and choose that are most sensible?

Additional info for Common Errors in Statistics (and How to Avoid Them) (4th Edition)

Example text

Dept of Commerce, 822 F. Supp. , 1993). Bothun [1998; p. 249] CHAPTER 3 COLLECTING DATA 45 Baggerly and Coombes [2009] examined several clinical trials in which patients were allocated to treatment arms on the basis of microarray-based signatures of drug sensitivity. Because the microarray studies often were poorly described or analyzed in error, the clinical trials results were rendered ambiguous. In contributing to a plaintiff’s lawsuit following a rear-end collision, Good [2009] noted that while the plaintiff was in her fifties and had been injured previously; the studies relied on by the defendant’s biomechanical expert involved only much younger individuals with no prior history of injury.

14⎞ ⎛ 10⎞ ⎜⎝ 10⎟⎠ ⎜⎝ 1 ⎟⎠ = 10, 010 of the assignments result in tables that are as extreme as our original table (that is, in which 90% of the men survive) and ⎛ 14⎞ ⎛ 10⎞ ⎜⎝ 11⎟⎠ ⎜⎝ 0 ⎟⎠ = 364 in tables that are more extreme (100% of the men survive). 529%, so we conclude that a difference in survival rates of the two sexes as extreme as the difference we observed in our original table is very unlikely to have occurred by chance alone. We reject the hypothesis that the survival rates for the two sexes are the same and accept the alternative hypothesis that, in this instance at least, males are more likely to profit from treatment.

If the data do not come from a well-tabulated distribution, then one might use a bootstrap to estimate the power and significance level. 3 in 1 out of 12 cases. Industry guidelines specified that any population with a mean test result greater than 5 would be acceptable. 1, 1/7th of the time. The statistical procedure required us to reject if the sample mean of the test results were less than 6. 2. Power as a Function of Sample Size. 40. 2. 89 Sample size two sets of test results. Some bootstrap samples consisted of all 7’s, some, taken from the worst-case distribution, only of 3’s.

Download PDF sample

Rated 4.58 of 5 – based on 44 votes