By The Comparative Method
Professor Ragin proposes a man-made new technique, in response to an software of Boolean algebra, that might mix the strengths of either qualitative and quantitative sociology. Elegantly obtainable and germane to the paintings of the entire social sciences, this publication will garner curiosity, debate, and compliment from many quarters.
Read Online or Download Charles C. Ragin: Moving Beyond Qualitative and Quantitative Strategies PDF
Similar statistics books
The following, by way of well known call for, is the up-to-date version to Joel Best's vintage advisor to knowing how numbers can confuse us. In his new afterword, top makes use of examples from contemporary coverage debates to mirror at the demanding situations to bettering statistical literacy. considering the fact that its book ten years in the past, Damned Lies and facts has emerged because the go-to guide for recognizing undesirable facts and studying to imagine seriously approximately those influential numbers.
Mathematical types within the social sciences became more and more subtle and common within the final decade. this era has additionally visible many opinions, so much lamenting the sacrifices incurred in pursuit of mathematical perfection. If, as critics argue, our skill to appreciate the area has now not better through the mathematization of the social sciences, we would are looking to undertake a distinct paradigm.
The position of the pc in statistics David Cox Nuffield university, Oxford OXIINF, U. okay. A class of statistical difficulties through their computational calls for hinges on 4 parts (I) the volume and complexity of the knowledge, (il) the specificity of the targets of the research, (iii) the large elements of the method of research, (ill) the conceptual, mathematical and numerical analytic complexity of the equipment.
Which functionality measures if you happen to use? the most obvious solution is that it relies on what you must in achieving, which another individual should not outline for you. in any case, it's your association, your division, or your approach. yet when you are transparent approximately what you must accomplish, how do you variety via quite a few attainable metrics and judge that are most sensible?
- Bayesian Networks in R: with Applications in Systems Biology (Use R!)
- Statistics for Business and Economics, Tenth Edition
- Models in Statistical Social Research (Social Research Today)
- Relative Distribution Methods in the Social Sciences (Statistics for Social and Behavioral Sciences)
- Energy Statistics of Non-OECD Countries 2011 (IEA Statistics)
- Bayesian Core: A Practical Approach to Computational Bayesian Statistics (Springer Texts in Statistics)
Extra resources for Charles C. Ragin: Moving Beyond Qualitative and Quantitative Strategies
A preference for generality over specificity enhances the compatibility of the second strategy with the goals of mainstream social science which, in turn, has allowed the use of mainstream methods, especially techniques of statistical control. This strategy attempts to approximate the rigor of experimental methods through statistical manipulation. The effects of competing and confounding variables are "removed" or "partialed" in estimating the effect of each variable. In this way conditions are "controlled," and a basis for generalizing about confounded causes is manufactured mathematically.
It is inferior, according to Smelser, because it must be used when the number of relevant cases is small and the possibility of establishing systematic control over the sources of variation in social phenomena is reduced. The possibilities for social scientific generalization are reduced. In fact, the method that Smelser calls "the method of systematic comparative illustration" is what social scientists traditionally have called the comparative method. It forms the core of the case-oriented strategy and is quite different from correlational methods which form the core of the vari- COMPARATIVE SOCIAL SCIENCE 13 able-oriented strategy (see Chapters 3 and 4).
The closer the approximation to the type of comparison fundamental to experimental design, the more sound the statement of empirical regularity. Obviously, social scientists rarely come close, and some argue that social scientists should simply acknowledge the limitations of their efforts and give up the experimental design standard. While it might be possible to abandon the standard, comparison still provides the primary basis for empirical generalization. As Swanson (1971:145) notes, "thinking without comparison is HETEROGENEITY AND CAUSAL COMPLEXITY 31 unthinkable"—and comparison, at its social scientific best, involves experiment-like contrasts.